Malala: Daughter of The Nation or a Western Agent?

Malala Yousafzai, the Pakistani education activist who survived a Taliban assassination attempt, has become a symbol of courage and resilience globally. Her advocacy for girls' education has garnered her praise, awards, and recognition worldwide. She defied the Taliban's oppressive rule in Pakistan's Swat Valley and spoke out for girls' education, which prompted global attention and support. In 2013 Malala and her father co-founded the Malala Fund, a nonprofit organization focused on advocating for girls' education and supporting programs that provide educational opportunities to girls around the world. In 2014, Malala became the youngest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, acknowledging her unwavering commitment to education and gender equality. However, her journey has also been fraught with controversy, with some questioning whether she is a "daughter of the nation" or a Western agent advancing foreign interests.

While Malala's advocacy for girls right to education has inspired countless young Pakistanis in their pursuit to learn, she has amplified the voice of Pakistani women by providing a platform for discussions on gender equality and human rights, However, it may be noted that Malala's rise to fame was largely due to Western media attention and support. Critics argue that her story aligns with Western narratives about the "war on terror" and women's rights, which may be used for political gain. In a CNN interview, where Pakistani's share their opinions on Malala, one stated that "I think Malala Yousafzai is a scam and she is just being used to mold education in Swat and other Taliban infiltrated areas", whereas another claimed "I think she is being used as a publicity stunt." One woman also claimed that she has nothing against Malala, but the UN providing an award to her is an act of humiliation against Pakistani's. This leaves us to question whether the effort that she has put to enhance the Pakistani education system has been a genuine one or was this all pre planned to propagate Western interests in Pakistan?

Some have claimed that Malala's advocacy may promote a Westernized education curriculum at the expense of traditional values and beliefs in Pakistan. In her book "I am Malala" she has contradictory views on the teachings of Islam, Quranic injunctions, and the Pakistan army. For example she criticizes Quranic verses about two women's testimony being equal to that of a man and was not in support of the Islamic law of 4 male witnesses required to verify a rape case reported by a woman. She also mentions the army being present in her region during the attack, but not responding in the best possible way. Kashif Mirza, the president of all Pakistan Private schools Federation claimed that this book is written at the behest of western forces who have used Malala for their ulterior motives and that she has declared Islam and Pakistan army as 'militant' in her book.

This leaves me to question all of you. Given the global fame she has acquired, and that security challenges were addressed, why did it take Malala six years to visit Pakistan after being treated in the United Kingdom? Why is she still in the United Kingdom and not residing in the nation that she almost died for?